Video video games, violence, and weapons: the irritating, enduring debate –

We use cookies and different monitoring applied sciences to enhance your looking expertise on our web site, present customized content material and focused adverts, analyze web site site visitors, and perceive the place our audiences come from. To study extra or opt-out, learn our Cookie Coverage. Please additionally learn our Privateness Discover and Phrases of Use, which grew to become efficient December 20, 2019.
By selecting I Settle for, you consent to our use of cookies and different monitoring applied sciences.
We requested gamers, mother and father, builders, and consultants to weigh in on find out how to change the dialog round gaming.
Within the wake of two mass shootings earlier this month in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, the societal function of video video games grabbed a well-known media highlight. The El Paso shooter briefly referenced Name of Obligation, a wildly common recreation by which gamers assume the roles of troopers throughout historic and fictional wartime, in his “manifesto.” And simply this small point out of the online game appeared to have prompted President Donald Trump to return to a theme he’s emphasised earlier than when trying to assign higher blame for violent incidents.
“We should cease the glorification of violence in our society,” he mentioned in an August 5 press convention. “This consists of the grotesque and grisly video video games that are actually commonplace. It’s too simple in the present day for troubled youth to encompass themselves with a tradition that celebrates violence.”
Trump’s assertion suggesting a hyperlink between video video games and real-world violence echoed sentiments shared by different lawmakers following the back-to-back mass shootings. It’s a response that main media retailers and retailers have additionally adopted of late; ESPN just lately selected to delay broadcasting an esports match due to the shootings — a call that appears to indicate the community believes in a hyperlink between gaming and real-world violence. And Walmart made a controversial determination to quickly take away all online game shows from its shops, even because it continues to brazenly promote weapons.
However many members of the general public, in addition to researchers and a few politicians, have counterargued that blaming video video games sidesteps the true subject on the root of America’s mass taking pictures drawback: a necessity for stronger gun management. The frenzied debate over video video games throughout the bigger dialog round gun violence underscores each how intense the battle over gun management has change into and the way simply video games can change into mired in political rhetoric.
However this isn’t a brand new improvement; blaming video video games for real-world violence — any type of real-world violence — is a longstanding cultural and political behavior whose origins date again to the Nineteen Seventies. It’s additionally arguably half of a bigger recurring wave of concern over any popular culture that’s been perceived as morally deviant, from rock ’n’ roll to the occult, relying on the period. However as mass shootings proceed to happen nationwide and makes an attempt to cease them by enacting gun management legislature stay divisive, video video games have once more change into a simple goal.
The latest clamor arose from a conflict amongst a number of acquainted foes. In a single nook: politicians like Trump who cite video video games as proof of immoral and violent media’s detrimental societal impression. In one other: individuals who play video video games and resist this studying, whereas additionally making an attempt to lodge separate critiques of violence inside gaming. In one other: scientists at odds over whether or not there are factual and causal hyperlinks between video video games and real-world violence. And in nonetheless one other: members of most people who, upon receiving alarmist messages about video games from politicians and the information media, react with but extra alarm.
On the lookout for a fast method to sustain with the endless information cycle? Host Sean Rameswaram will information you thru an important tales on the finish of every day.
Subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Oversolid, or wherever you hearken to podcasts.

What is new, nonetheless, is that latest criticism of the narrative that video video games result in real-world violence appears notably intensified, and it’s coming not simply from players but in addition from scientists, some media retailers, even mass taking pictures survivors: David Hogg, who grew to become a gun management advocate after surviving the 2018 mass taking pictures in Parkland, Florida, unveiled a brand new March for Our Lives gun management initiative in August, pointedly stating in his announcement on Twitter, “We all know video video games aren’t guilty.”
And on all sides is a way that frustration is rising as a result of so little has modified because the final time we had this debate — and because the time earlier than that and the time earlier than that.
Traditionally, video video games have performed a verifiable function in a handful of mass shootings, however the science linking video video games to gun violence is murky. An enormous physique of psychology analysis, most of it performed earlier than 2015, argues strenuously that video video games can contribute to will increase in aggression. But a lot of this analysis has been contested by newer, contradictory findings from each psychologists and students in several educational fields. For instance, Nickie Phillips, a criminologist whose analysis offers with violence in common media, instructed me that “most criminologists are dismissive of a causal hyperlink between media and crime,” and that they’re as a substitute curious about questions of violence as a social assemble and the way that contributes to political discourse.
That kind of analysis, she pressured, is more likely to be much less flashy and headline-grabbing than psychology research, that are extra targeted on pointing to direct behaviors and their causes. “Social meanings of crime are in transition,” Phillips mentioned. “There’s not a single variable. As a public, we would like a single concrete rationalization as to why folks commit atrocities, when the solutions could be very complicated.”
The controversy over the science is simple to wade into, however it obscures simply how preoccupied America is with harmful media. The oldest ethical panic over a online game will be the controversy over a 1976 recreation known as Loss of life Race, which awarded gamers factors for driving over fleeing pedestrians dubbed “gremlins.” The sport grew to become mired in controversy, even sparking a phase on 60 Minutes. Curiously, different video games of the period that framed their mechanics via wartime violence, just like the 1974 navy recreation Tank, didn’t trigger as a lot public concern.
In his 2017 guide Ethical Fight: Why the Conflict on Violent Video Video games Is Mistaken, psychologist Patrick Markey factors out that earlier than involved residents fixated on video video games, a lot of them have been apprehensive about arcades — not due to the video games they contained, however as a result of they have been licentious hangouts for teenagers. (Insert “Ya Received Bother” right here.) By the Eighties, “Arcades have been being shut down throughout the nation by activist mother and father intent on defending their kids from the harmful influences lurking inside these neon-drenched dungeons,” Markey writes.
Then got here the franchise that developed arcade panic into gameplay panic: Halfway Video games’ Mortal Kombat, notorious for its gory “fatality” strikes. With its 1992 arcade debut, Mortal Kombat sparked hysteria amongst involved adults that led to a 1993 congressional listening to and the creation of the Leisure Software program Score Board, or ESRB. The preventing recreation franchise nonetheless incites debate with each new launch.
“Like folks have been actually going to exit and rip folks’s spines out,” Cypheroftyr, a gaming critic who sometimes goes by her web deal with, instructed me over the telephone concerning the mainstream anxiousness round Mortal Kombat within the Nineties. Cypheroftyr is an avid participant of shooter video games and different motion video games and the founding father of the nonprofit I Want Numerous Video games.
“I’m sufficiently old to recollect the entire Jack Thompson period of making an attempt to say video video games are violent and they need to be banned,” she mentioned, referencing the notorious disbarred obscenity lawyer identified for a strident campaign in opposition to video games and different media that has spanned a long time.
Cypheroftyr identified that after the Columbine taking pictures in April 1999, politicians “have been making an attempt guilty each video video games and Marilyn Manson. It simply seems like that is too simple a scapegoat.”
Politicians have lengthy seized on the concept leisure fantasy and fictional media have an affect on real-world evil. In 2007, for instance, Sen. Mitt Romney (R–UT) blamed “music and films and TV and video video games” for being filled with “pornography and violence,” which he argued had influenced the Columbine shooters and, later, the 2007 Virginia Tech shooter.
Video video games appear particularly liable to garnering political consideration within the wake of a tragedy — particularly first-person shooters like Name of Obligation. A stereotype of a mass shooter, remoted and perpetually consuming graphic violent content material, appears to linger within the public’s consciousness. A neighbor of the 2018 Parkland shooter, for example, instructed the Miami Herald that the shooter would play video video games for as much as 12 to fifteen hours a day — and though that anecdotal report was unverified, it was nonetheless extensively circulated.
A 2015 Pew examine of two,000 US adults discovered that though 49 p.c of grownup Individuals play video video games, 40 p.c of Individuals additionally consider in a hyperlink between video games and violence — particularly, that “individuals who play violent video video games usually tend to be violent themselves.” Moreover, 32 p.c of the individuals who instructed Pew they play video video games additionally mentioned they consider gaming contributes to a rise in aggression, though their very own expertise as, presumably, nonviolent players would supply at the least some proof on the contrary.
One one who sees a correlation between violent video games and a propensity for real-world violence is Tim Winter. Winter is the president of the Mother and father Tv Council, a nonpartisan advocacy group that lobbies the leisure business in opposition to advertising graphic violence to kids. He spent a number of years overseeing MGM’s former online game publishing division, MGM Interactive, and moved into advocacy when he grew to become a dad or mum. Rising up, his kids performed every kind of video video games, apart from these he thought-about too graphic or violent.
In a telephone interview, Winter instructed me his view aligns with the analysis supporting hyperlinks between video games and aggression.
“Anybody who makes use of the time period ‘ethical panic’ for my part is making an attempt to decrease a bona fide dialog that should happen,” Winter mentioned. “It’s a easy PR transfer to refute one thing which may even have some worth within the broader dialog.”
Throughout our dialog, he in contrast the connection between violent media and dangerous real-world results to that between cigarettes and lung most cancers. Should you devour sparsely, he argues, you’ll most likely be high quality; however, over time, publicity to violent media can have “a cumulative detrimental impact.” (The truth is, research of rare people who smoke have proven that their threat of coronary illness is roughly equal to that of frequent people who smoke, and their threat of most cancers continues to be considerably greater than that of nonsmokers.)
“What I consider to be true is that the media we devour has a really highly effective impression on shaping our perception construction, our cognitive improvement, our values, and our opinions,” he mentioned.
He added that it might be silly to level to anyone act of violence and say it was brought on by anyone online game — that, he argued, “can be like saying lung most cancers was brought on by that one particular cigarette I smoked.”
“However if you’re more likely to smoke packs a day over the course of a few years, it has a cumulative detrimental impact in your well being,” he continued. “I consider based mostly on the analysis on each side that that’s the prevailing reality.”
Like many individuals I spoke with for this story, Winter believes that the talk about gun violence has remained largely at a standstill since Columbine, whereas the variety of mass shootings nationwide has continued to extend.
“Should you have a look at the broader subject of gun violence in America, you’ve got quite a few organizations and constituencies pointing at totally different causes,” he mentioned. “Once you look again at what these arguments are, it’s the identical arguments which have been made going again to Columbine. Whether or not it’s gun management, whether or not it’s psychological sickness, whether or not it’s violence in media tradition — regardless of the debate is about these three root causes, little or no progress has been made on any of them.”
The glorification of violence is so culturally embedded in American media via TV, movie, video games, books, and virtually each different accessible medium that there appears to be little or no impetus to alter something about America’s gun tradition. We will outline “gun tradition” right here because the addition of an embrace of gun possession and a nationwide oversupply of weapons to what Phillips described as “a tradition of violence” — one by which violence “turns into our go-to means of fixing issues — whether or not that’s particular person violence, police violence, state violence.”
“There’s a commodification of violence,” she mentioned, “and we have now to grasp what meaning.”
Naomi Clark, an unbiased recreation developer and co-chair of New York College’s Sport Heart program, agreed. “I discover it extra believable that America’s long-standing tradition of gun violence has affected video video games, as a type of tradition, than the opposite means round,” she instructed me in an electronic mail. “In any case, this nation’s cultural traditions and attachments round weapons are far older than video video games.”
In mild of incidents like Walmart’s elimination of online game shows after the latest mass shootings whereas persevering with to promote weapons, the connection between the shootings and America’s continued valorization of weapons feels extraordinarily stark. “We may ban video video games tomorrow and mass shootings would nonetheless occur,” Cypheroftyr instructed me.
“What’s new concerning the present debate is that the scapegoat of videogaming has by no means been extra nakedly uncovered for what it’s,” gaming sociologist Katherine Cross wrote in an electronic mail, “with Republicans and conservatives manifestly afraid of blaming systematic white supremacism, Trump’s rhetoric, or our nation’s permissive and freewheeling gun tradition for the latest rash of terrorism.”
Due to the sensitivity across the subject of gun management, it’s simple for politicians to attain factors with constituents by focusing a dialog on video games and sidestepping different motion. “Politicians usually blame video video games as a result of they’re a secure goal,” Ethical Fight writer Markey instructed me in an electronic mail. “There isn’t an enormous online game foyer like different potential causes of mass shootings (just like the NRA [National Rifle Association]). So [by targeting games], a politician could make it seem they’re doing one thing with out risking shedding any votes.”
And most people is usually vulnerable to this rhetoric, each as a result of it’s emotional and since it could feed what they suppose they already learn about video games — even when that’s not rather a lot. “The narrative that violence in video video games contributes to the gun violence in America is, I feel, an excellent instance of a foul concept that appears proper to individuals who don’t look too intently on the details,” Zak Garriss, a online game author and designer who’s labored on a variety of video games, instructed me in an electronic mail.
“Video video games are a world business, dwarfing different leisure industries in income in markets comprised of players from the UK, Germany, France, Japan, the US, and mainly wherever there’s electrical energy. But the spree taking pictures phenomenon appears to be critically and uniquely a US subject proper now. It’s additionally price noting that the scores methods throughout these international locations differ, and within the case of Europe, are sometimes extra liberal in lots of regards than the US system,” Garriss mentioned.
He additionally identified that this dialog ceaselessly overshadows the essential, progressive work that many video games are engaged in. “Video games like Stardew Valley, Minecraft, or Journey craft experiences that assist folks calm down, detox after a day, bond with pals,” he mentioned. “Video games like Papers, Please, That Dragon Most cancers, or Life Is Unusual interrogate the tougher and the darker components of the human expertise like love, grief, loneliness, and loss of life.”
In different phrases, a dialog that focuses on video games and weapons alone dismisses the important cultural function that video video games play as artwork. “Play video video games and you may soar on large mushrooms, shoot a wizard on the moon, develop a farm, fall in love, expertise practically infinite worlds actually,” Garriss instructed me. “If video games have a unifying organizing precept, I’d say it’s to please. The pursuit of enjoyable.”
He continued: “To me, the tragedy, if there may be one, within the present discourse round video video games and violence, lies in failing to see the magic occurring within the play. As devs, it’s a magic we’re chasing with each recreation. And as gamers, I feel it’s a magic that has not simply the potential however the precise energy to deliver folks collectively, to assist psychological well being, to make us suppose, to assist us heal. And to expertise delight.”
However for some members of the general public, video games’ leisure, relaxational, and inventive values may be one other factor that make them suspect. “In the event that they don’t play video games or ‘aged out of it,’ they could see them as frivolous or a waste of time,” Cypheroftyr says. “It’s simple to go, ‘Oh, you’re nonetheless enjoying video video games? Why are you losing your life?’”
That concept — that video video games are a waste of time — is one other longstanding ingredient of cultural assumptions round video games of every kind, Clark, the sport developer, instructed me. “Video games have been a simple goal in each period as a result of there’s one thing inherently unproductive and even anti-productive about them, and so there’s additionally a protracted historical past of recreation designers making an attempt to rehabilitate video games and make them ‘do work’ or present instruction.”
All of this makes it extremely simple to fixate on video video games as a substitute of addressing tough however extra related targets, like NRA funding and quick access to weapons. And that, in flip, makes it an advanced proposition to extricate video video games from conversations about gun violence, not to mention restrict the dialog round violent video games to individuals who would possibly truly be able to create change, just like the individuals who make the video games within the first place.
But what’s placing if you drill down into the group round gaming is what number of players agree with most of the arguments politicians are making. As a fan of shooter video games, Cypheroftyr instructed me she routinely performs violent video games like Name of Obligation and the navy motion role-playing recreation (RPG) The Division. “I’m not out right here making an attempt to homicide folks,” she pressured. However just like the Mother and father Tv Council’s Winter, Cypheroftyr and most of the different folks I spoke with agree that the gaming business must do much more to look at the at instances surprising imagery it perpetuates.
A number of folks I spoke with expressed frustration that the dialog about video video games’ function in mass shootings is obscuring one other, essential dialog available throughout the gaming group about violent video games.
Clark instructed me that the general public’s lack of nuance and an insistence on a binary studying of the problem is a part of the issue. “Most individuals are able to understanding that causes are complicated,” she mentioned, “which you can’t simply level to at least one factor and say, ‘That is principally or solely guilty!’”
However she additionally cautioned that the gaming group’s reactionary defensiveness to this lack of nuance additionally prevents many online game followers from acknowledging that video games do play a task inside a violent tradition. “That complexity cuts each methods,” she instructed me. “Despite the fact that it’s foolish to say that ‘video games trigger violence,’ it’s additionally simply as foolish to say that video games don’t have anything to do with a tradition that has a violence drawback.”
That tradition is endemic to the gaming business, added Justin Carter, a contract journalist whose work focuses on video video games and tradition.
“The business does have a fetishization of weapons and violence,” Carter mentioned. “You have a look at video games like Borderlands or Future and one of many promoting factors is what number of weapons there are.” The upcoming first-person shooter recreation Borderlands 3, he identified, boasts “over a billion” totally different weapons from its 12 fictional weapons producers, all of which tout particular perks to get gamers to strive their weapons. These perks function advertising each inside and out of doors the sport; the sport’s writer, 2K Video games, invitations gamers to exult in violence utilizing language that speaks for itself:
Ship devastating important hits to enemies’ soft-and-sensitives, then joy-puke as your bullets ricochet in direction of different targets. …
Step 1: Hit your enemies with tracker tags. Step 2: Unleash a hail of Sensible Bullets that observe in direction of your targets. Step 3: Loot!
Deal assured elemental harm together with your finger glued to the set off …
“There are only a few [action/adventure] video games that provide you with choices apart from murdering folks,” Cypheroftyr mentioned. “Video games don’t do sufficient to point out the opposite facet of it. You shoot somebody, you die, they die, you reset, you reload, and nothing occurs.”
“I do know that if I shoot folks in a recreation it’s not actual,” she added. “99.9 p.c of individuals don’t have to be instructed that. I’m not enjoying out an influence fantasy or something, however I’ve change into extra conscious of how most video games [that] use violence [do so] to resolve issues.”
An insistence from recreation builders on blithely ignoring the potential political messages of their video games is one other frustration for her. “All these recreation makers are like, there’s no politics within the recreation. There’s no message. And I’m like … did you simply ship me via a warfare museum and also you’re telling me this?!”
The sport Cypheroftyr is referencing is The Division 2, which incorporates a part the place gamers can interact in enemy fight throughout a walkthrough of a Vietnam Conflict memorial museum. Whereas she loves the sport, she instructed me the truth that gamers use weapons from the Vietnam Conflict period whereas in a warfare museum belies recreation builders’ frequent arguments that such video games are apolitical.
One other recreation Cypheroftyr has discovered disturbing in its try to background politics with none actual self-reflection is the favored journey recreation Detroit Grow to be Human, which shows pacifist Martin Luther King Jr. quotes alongside gameplay that permits gamers to decide on excessive violence as an possibility. “You may take a extra pacifistic method, however chances are you’ll not get the ending you need,” she defined.
She famous, too, that the navy makes use of video video games for coaching as a part of what’s been dubbed the “military-entertainment complicated,” with ways involving shooter video games that some ex-soldiers have referred to as “extra like brainwashing than something.” The US Military started exploring digital coaching in 1999 and started growing its first ways recreation a yr later. The consequence, Full Spectrum Command, was a military-only model of 2003’s Full Spectrum Warrior. Since then, the navy has used video video games to show troopers every little thing from find out how to cope with fight eventualities to find out how to work together with Iraqi civilians.
The shut connection between video games and sanctioned real-world violence, i.e., warfare, is difficult to disclaim with any plausibility. “When somebody insists that these two elements of tradition have completely nothing to do with one another,” Clark mentioned, “it smacks of denial, and lots of recreation builders are asking themselves, ‘Do I wish to be a part of this panorama?’ even when they’ve zero perception that video video games are inflicting violence.”
For all of the gaming business’s faults on the subject of frankly addressing gaming’s function in a violent tradition, nonetheless, many individuals are fast to level out that critiques of in-game violence also can come from the video video games themselves. In Batman: Arkham Asylum, for instance, researchers Christina Fawcett and Steven Kohm just lately discovered that the sport “straight implicate[s] the participant in violence enacted upon the our bodies of criminals and sufferers alike.” Different video games shift the main target away from the perpetrators to the victims — for instance, This Conflict of Mine is a survival recreation impressed by the Bosnian Conflict that focuses not on troopers however on civilians coping with the prices of wartime violence.
However acknowledging that critiques of violent video games are coming from throughout the gaming group doesn’t play nicely as a part of the gun management debate. “It’s far too simple to scapegoat video video games as low-hanging fruit as a substitute of addressing the true points,” Cypheroftyr mentioned, “like the convenience with which we will get weapons on this nation, and why we don’t do extra to punish the perpetrators [of gun violence].” She additionally cites the cultural tendency to excuse masculine aggression early on with a “b“boys will likely be boys” mentality — which may breed the type of entitlement that results in extra violence afterward.
All these components mix to make the dialog round violent video video games inherently political and half of a bigger ongoing debate that finally facilities on which media messages are the most accountable for fueling real-world violence.
Video games journalist Carter instructed me he feels the gaming group must, in essence, reject the entire debate solely as a result of at this level in its life cycle, it’s disingenuous.
“We’ve been via sufficient shootings that the playbook, and it’s annoying that players and folks within the business will take this as a place that wants defending,” he instructed me. “It’s not a dialog price having anymore solely on post-traumatic phrases.”
Discussions about online game violence have to be held primarily throughout the video games group, Carter mentioned, and held “with people who find themselves truly curious about determining an answer as a substitute of politicians trying to move off the blame for his or her ineptitude and greed.”
However some players instructed me they don’t belief the gaming group to border the dialog with acceptable nuance. All of them cited Gamergate’s violent male entitlement and the impact that its subsequent bleed into the bigger alt-right motion’s misogyny and white supremacy have had on mainstream tradition at massive.
“The framing of that rhetoric that started in Gamergate as a part of the ‘low’ tradition of area of interest web boards grew to become a part of the mainstream political discourse,” criminologist Phillips identified. “The expression of their misogyny and the notion of being pushed out of their white male-dominated house was a microcosm of what was to return. We’re speaking about 8chan now, however [the growth of the alt-right] was fueled by gaming tradition.” She factors to Gamergate for instance of the sophisticated interaction between gaming tradition, on-line communities filled with poisonous, violent rhetoric, and the rise of on-line extremism that’s more and more shifting offline.
Gaming sociologist Cross agreed. “At this second, there may be pressing have to shine a light-weight on online game tradition, the fan areas which have been infiltrated by white supremacists trying to recruit that minority of players who rage in opposition to ‘political correctness,’” she instructed me.
“We deal with video video games as unreal, as unserious play, and that creates a shadow over gaming boards and fan communities that has allowed toxicity to take root. It’s additionally allowed neo-Nazis to function principally unseen. That is what wants to alter.”
The ensuing shadow over gaming has unfold far and large — and located violent echoes within the rhetoric of Trump himself. “Have a look at what the individual within the very highest workplace of the US is cultivating,” Cypheroftyr mentioned. “Poisonous masculinity, this concept that males, particularly white males, have been fed that they’re shedding ‘their’ nation.”
“Whereas video video games don’t affect us in a monkey-see-monkey-do method, they do, like all media, form how we see the world,” Cross argues. “Republicans, in broaching that risk, open themselves as much as the critique that their chief, who makes frequent use of each previous media and social media, may also be influential in a poisonous means.”
And this, finally, could also be why the present debate round video video games and violence feels notably intense: The extremes of poisonous gaming tradition are fueling the attitudes of poisonous alt-right tradition, which in flip fuels the rhetoric of President Trump and lots of different right-wing politicians — the identical rhetoric that many white supremacist mass shooters are utilizing to justify their atrocities.
So when Trump rails in opposition to violence in video video games, as he’s now accomplished a number of instances, he’s protesting a fictionalized model of the real-life violence that his personal rhetoric appears to tacitly encourage. If we’re to just accept the argument that media violence as represented by video games is able to bringing about real-world violence, then absolutely no media affect is extra highly effective or filled with harmful potential than that wielded by the president of the US.
In 2018, Vice’s gaming vertical Waypoint devoted every week to “weapons and video games”; in a shifting piece outlining the intent of the venture, editor Austin Walker noticed that not like real-world violence, “in big-budget motion video games, and particularly video games that give the participant weapons and plentiful ammunition, violence is affordable and endlessly repeatable.”
But now, barely a yr later, mass shootings and different incidents of real-world violence have additionally begun to look endlessly repeatable. Maybe that’s the reason, ultimately, the urgency of shifting our cultural focus from fixing violence in video games to fixing violence in the true world seems like it’s lastly outstripping the incessant debate.
Will you assist Vox’s explanatory journalism?
Hundreds of thousands flip to Vox to grasp what’s occurring within the information. Our mission has by no means been extra important than it’s on this second: to empower via understanding. Monetary contributions from our readers are a important a part of supporting our resource-intensive work and assist us maintain our journalism free for all. Please think about making a contribution to Vox in the present day.


Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button