Video video games, violence, and weapons: the irritating, enduring debate –

We use cookies and different monitoring applied sciences to enhance your looking expertise on our website, present personalised content material and focused advertisements, analyze website site visitors, and perceive the place our audiences come from. To be taught extra or opt-out, learn our Cookie Coverage. Please additionally learn our Privateness Discover and Phrases of Use, which grew to become efficient December 20, 2019.
By selecting I Settle for, you consent to our use of cookies and different monitoring applied sciences.
We requested gamers, mother and father, builders, and specialists to weigh in on easy methods to change the dialog round gaming.
Within the wake of two mass shootings earlier this month in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, the societal position of video video games grabbed a well-known media highlight. The El Paso shooter briefly referenced Name of Obligation, a wildly well-liked sport through which gamers assume the roles of troopers throughout historic and fictional wartime, in his “manifesto.” And simply this small point out of the online game appeared to have prompted President Donald Trump to return to a theme he’s emphasised earlier than when seeking to assign better blame for violent incidents.
“We should cease the glorification of violence in our society,” he stated in an August 5 press convention. “This consists of the ugly and grisly video video games that are actually commonplace. It’s too straightforward at present for troubled youth to encompass themselves with a tradition that celebrates violence.”
Trump’s assertion suggesting a hyperlink between video video games and real-world violence echoed sentiments shared by different lawmakers following the back-to-back mass shootings. It’s a response that main media shops and retailers have additionally adopted of late; ESPN just lately selected to delay broadcasting an esports event due to the shootings — a choice that appears to indicate the community believes in a hyperlink between gaming and real-world violence. And Walmart made a controversial choice to quickly take away all online game shows from its shops, even because it continues to overtly promote weapons.
However many members of the general public, in addition to researchers and a few politicians, have counterargued that blaming video video games sidesteps the actual situation on the root of America’s mass capturing drawback: a necessity for stronger gun management. The frenzied debate over video video games throughout the bigger dialog round gun violence underscores each how intense the struggle over gun management has develop into and the way simply video games can develop into mired in political rhetoric.
However this isn’t a brand new growth; blaming video video games for real-world violence — any form of real-world violence — is a longstanding cultural and political behavior whose origins date again to the Nineteen Seventies. It’s additionally arguably half of a bigger recurring wave of concern over any popular culture that’s been perceived as morally deviant, from rock ’n’ roll to the occult, relying on the period. However as mass shootings proceed to happen nationwide and makes an attempt to cease them by enacting gun management legislature stay divisive, video video games have once more develop into a straightforward goal.
The newest clamor arose from a conflict amongst a number of acquainted foes. In a single nook: politicians like Trump who cite video video games as proof of immoral and violent media’s detrimental societal influence. In one other: individuals who play video video games and resist this studying, whereas additionally attempting to lodge separate critiques of violence inside gaming. In one other: scientists at odds over whether or not there are factual and causal hyperlinks between video video games and real-world violence. And in nonetheless one other: members of most of the people who, upon receiving alarmist messages about video games from politicians and the information media, react with but extra alarm.
Searching for a fast option to sustain with the unending information cycle? Host Sean Rameswaram will information you thru an important tales on the finish of every day.
Subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Oversolid, or wherever you take heed to podcasts.

What is new, nonetheless, is that latest criticism of the narrative that video video games result in real-world violence appears significantly intensified, and it’s coming not simply from players but additionally from scientists, some media shops, even mass capturing survivors: David Hogg, who grew to become a gun management advocate after surviving the 2018 mass capturing in Parkland, Florida, unveiled a brand new March for Our Lives gun management initiative in August, pointedly stating in his announcement on Twitter, “We all know video video games aren’t in charge.”
And on all sides is a way that frustration is rising as a result of so little has modified for the reason that final time we had this debate — and for the reason that time earlier than that and the time earlier than that.
Traditionally, video video games have performed a verifiable position in a handful of mass shootings, however the science linking video video games to gun violence is murky. An unlimited physique of psychology analysis, most of it carried out earlier than 2015, argues strenuously that video video games can contribute to will increase in aggression. But a lot of this analysis has been contested by newer, contradictory findings from each psychologists and students in numerous educational fields. For instance, Nickie Phillips, a criminologist whose analysis offers with violence in well-liked media, instructed me that “most criminologists are dismissive of a causal hyperlink between media and crime,” and that they’re as an alternative fascinated by questions of violence as a social assemble and the way that contributes to political discourse.
That sort of analysis, she confused, is prone to be much less flashy and headline-grabbing than psychology research, that are extra centered on pointing to direct behaviors and their causes. “Social meanings of crime are in transition,” Phillips stated. “There’s not a single variable. As a public, we wish a single concrete rationalization as to why individuals commit atrocities, when the solutions may be very advanced.”
The controversy over the science is straightforward to wade into, however it obscures simply how preoccupied America is with harmful media. The oldest ethical panic over a online game often is the controversy over a 1976 sport referred to as Dying Race, which awarded gamers factors for driving over fleeing pedestrians dubbed “gremlins.” The sport grew to become mired in controversy, even sparking a section on 60 Minutes. Curiously, different video games of the period that framed their mechanics by way of wartime violence, just like the 1974 navy sport Tank, did not trigger as a lot public concern.
In his 2017 guide Ethical Fight: Why the Battle on Violent Video Video games Is Incorrect, psychologist Patrick Markey factors out that earlier than involved residents fixated on video video games, a lot of them have been nervous about arcades — not due to the video games they contained, however as a result of they have been licentious hangouts for teenagers. (Insert “Ya Acquired Hassle” right here.) By the Nineteen Eighties, “Arcades have been being shut down throughout the nation by activist mother and father intent on defending their kids from the damaging influences lurking inside these neon-drenched dungeons,” Markey writes.
Then got here the franchise that advanced arcade panic into gameplay panic: Halfway Video games’ Mortal Kombat, notorious for its gory “fatality” strikes. With its 1992 arcade debut, Mortal Kombat sparked hysteria amongst involved adults that led to a 1993 congressional listening to and the creation of the Leisure Software program Ranking Board, or ESRB. The combating sport franchise nonetheless incites debate with each new launch.
“Like individuals have been actually going to exit and rip individuals’s spines out,” Cypheroftyr, a gaming critic who sometimes goes by her web deal with, instructed me over the telephone relating to the mainstream anxiousness round Mortal Kombat within the Nineties. Cypheroftyr is an avid participant of shooter video games and different motion video games and the founding father of the nonprofit I Want Numerous Video games.
“I’m sufficiently old to recollect the entire Jack Thompson period of attempting to say video video games are violent and they need to be banned,” she stated, referencing the notorious disbarred obscenity lawyer identified for a strident campaign in opposition to video games and different media that has spanned a long time.
Cypheroftyr identified that after the Columbine capturing in April 1999, politicians “have been attempting in charge each video video games and Marilyn Manson. It simply appears like that is too straightforward a scapegoat.”
Politicians have lengthy seized on the concept that leisure fantasy and fictional media have an affect on real-world evil. In 2007, for instance, Sen. Mitt Romney (R–UT) blamed “music and films and TV and video video games” for being filled with “pornography and violence,” which he argued had influenced the Columbine shooters and, later, the 2007 Virginia Tech shooter.
Video video games appear particularly susceptible to garnering political consideration within the wake of a tragedy — particularly first-person shooters like Name of Obligation. A stereotype of a mass shooter, remoted and perpetually consuming graphic violent content material, appears to linger within the public’s consciousness. A neighbor of the 2018 Parkland shooter, as an illustration, instructed the Miami Herald that the shooter would play video video games for as much as 12 to fifteen hours a day — and though that anecdotal report was unverified, it was nonetheless extensively circulated.
A 2015 Pew research of two,000 US adults discovered that despite the fact that 49 % of grownup Individuals play video video games, 40 % of Individuals additionally imagine in a hyperlink between video games and violence — particularly, that “individuals who play violent video video games usually tend to be violent themselves.” Moreover, 32 % of the individuals who instructed Pew they play video video games additionally stated they imagine gaming contributes to a rise in aggression, despite the fact that their very own expertise as, presumably, nonviolent players would provide at the very least some proof on the contrary.
One one that sees a correlation between violent video games and a propensity for real-world violence is Tim Winter. Winter is the president of the Dad and mom Tv Council, a nonpartisan advocacy group that lobbies the leisure business in opposition to advertising graphic violence to kids. He spent a number of years overseeing MGM’s former online game publishing division, MGM Interactive, and moved into advocacy when he grew to become a guardian. Rising up, his kids performed every kind of video video games, apart from these he thought of too graphic or violent.
In a telephone interview, Winter instructed me his view aligns with the analysis supporting hyperlinks between video games and aggression.
“Anybody who makes use of the time period ‘ethical panic’ in my opinion is attempting to decrease a bona fide dialog that should happen,” Winter stated. “It’s a easy PR transfer to refute one thing that may even have some worth within the broader dialog.”
Throughout our dialog, he in contrast the connection between violent media and dangerous real-world results to that between cigarettes and lung most cancers. When you devour moderately, he argues, you’ll in all probability be nice; however, over time, publicity to violent media can have “a cumulative detrimental impact.” (Actually, research of rare people who smoke have proven that their threat of coronary illness is roughly equal to that of frequent people who smoke, and their threat of most cancers remains to be considerably greater than that of nonsmokers.)
“What I imagine to be true is that the media we devour has a really highly effective influence on shaping our perception construction, our cognitive growth, our values, and our opinions,” he stated.
He added that it could be silly to level to anybody act of violence and say it was attributable to anybody online game — that, he argued, “can be like saying lung most cancers was attributable to that one particular cigarette I smoked.”
“However if you’re prone to smoke packs a day over the course of a few years, it has a cumulative detrimental impact in your well being,” he continued. “I imagine primarily based on the analysis on either side that that’s the prevailing reality.”
Like many individuals I spoke with for this story, Winter believes that the controversy about gun violence has remained largely at a standstill since Columbine, whereas the variety of mass shootings nationwide has continued to extend.
“When you have a look at the broader situation of gun violence in America, you’ve gotten various organizations and constituencies pointing at completely different causes,” he stated. “Once you look again at what these arguments are, it’s the identical arguments which have been made going again to Columbine. Whether or not it’s gun management, whether or not it’s psychological sickness, whether or not it’s violence in media tradition — regardless of the debate is about these three root causes, little or no progress has been made on any of them.”
The glorification of violence is so culturally embedded in American media by way of TV, movie, video games, books, and virtually each different out there medium that there appears to be little or no impetus to vary something about America’s gun tradition. We are able to outline “gun tradition” right here because the addition of an embrace of gun possession and a nationwide oversupply of weapons to what Phillips described as “a tradition of violence” — one through which violence “turns into our go-to manner of fixing issues — whether or not that’s particular person violence, police violence, state violence.”
“There’s a commodification of violence,” she stated, “and we have now to grasp what meaning.”
Naomi Clark, an unbiased sport developer and co-chair of New York College’s Sport Heart program, agreed. “I discover it extra believable that America’s long-standing tradition of gun violence has affected video video games, as a type of tradition, than the opposite manner round,” she instructed me in an e mail. “In spite of everything, this nation’s cultural traditions and attachments round weapons are far older than video video games.”
In mild of incidents like Walmart’s elimination of online game shows after the latest mass shootings whereas persevering with to promote weapons, the connection between the shootings and America’s continued valorization of weapons feels extraordinarily stark. “We might ban video video games tomorrow and mass shootings would nonetheless occur,” Cypheroftyr instructed me.
“What’s new concerning the present debate is that the scapegoat of videogaming has by no means been extra nakedly uncovered for what it’s,” gaming sociologist Katherine Cross wrote in an e mail, “with Republicans and conservatives manifestly terrified of blaming systematic white supremacism, Trump’s rhetoric, or our nation’s permissive and freewheeling gun tradition for the latest rash of terrorism.”
Due to the sensitivity across the situation of gun management, it’s straightforward for politicians to attain factors with constituents by focusing a dialog on video games and sidestepping different motion. “Politicians usually blame video video games as a result of they’re a protected goal,” Ethical Fight creator Markey instructed me in an e mail. “There isn’t a large online game foyer like different potential causes of mass shootings (just like the NRA [National Rifle Association]). So [by targeting games], a politician could make it seem they’re doing one thing with out risking dropping any votes.”
And most of the people is commonly inclined to this rhetoric, each as a result of it’s emotional and since it could feed what they suppose they already learn about video games — even when that’s not loads. “The narrative that violence in video video games contributes to the gun violence in America is, I believe, a great instance of a nasty concept that appears proper to individuals who don’t look too carefully on the info,” Zak Garriss, a online game author and designer who’s labored on a variety of video games, instructed me in an e mail.
“Video video games are a worldwide business, dwarfing different leisure industries in income in markets comprised of players from the UK, Germany, France, Japan, the US, and principally wherever there’s electrical energy. But the spree capturing phenomenon appears to be severely and uniquely a US situation proper now. It’s additionally price noting that the rankings techniques throughout these international locations differ, and within the case of Europe, are sometimes extra liberal in lots of regards than the US system,” Garriss stated.
He additionally identified that this dialog often overshadows the vital, modern work that many video games are engaged in. “Video games like Stardew Valley, Minecraft, or Journey craft experiences that assist individuals chill out, detox after a day, bond with mates,” he stated. “Video games like Papers, Please, That Dragon Most cancers, or Life Is Unusual interrogate the tougher and the darker parts of the human expertise like love, grief, loneliness, and dying.”
In different phrases, a dialog that focuses on video games and weapons alone dismisses the very important cultural position that video video games play as artwork. “Play video video games and you’ll leap on big mushrooms, shoot a wizard on the moon, develop a farm, fall in love, expertise almost infinite worlds actually,” Garriss instructed me. “If video games have a unifying organizing precept, I’d say it’s to please. The pursuit of enjoyable.”
He continued: “To me, the tragedy, if there may be one, within the present discourse round video video games and violence, lies in failing to see the magic taking place within the play. As devs, it’s a magic we’re chasing with each sport. And as gamers, I believe it’s a magic that has not simply the potential however the precise energy to convey individuals collectively, to assist psychological well being, to make us suppose, to assist us heal. And to expertise delight.”
However for some members of the general public, video games’ leisure, relaxational, and inventive values is perhaps one other factor that make them suspect. “In the event that they don’t play video games or ‘aged out of it,’ they may see them as frivolous or a waste of time,” Cypheroftyr says. “It’s straightforward to go, ‘Oh, you’re nonetheless enjoying video video games? Why are you losing your life?’”
That concept — that video video games are a waste of time — is one other longstanding component of cultural assumptions round video games of every kind, Clark, the sport developer, instructed me. “Video games have been a straightforward goal in each period as a result of there’s one thing inherently unproductive and even anti-productive about them, and so there’s additionally a protracted historical past of sport designers attempting to rehabilitate video games and make them ‘do work’ or present instruction.”
All of this makes it extremely straightforward to fixate on video video games as an alternative of addressing tough however extra related targets, like NRA funding and quick access to weapons. And that, in flip, makes it a sophisticated proposition to extricate video video games from conversations about gun violence, not to mention restrict the dialog round violent video games to individuals who may truly be able to create change, just like the individuals who make the video games within the first place.
But what’s putting while you drill down into the neighborhood round gaming is what number of players agree with most of the arguments politicians are making. As a fan of shooter video games, Cypheroftyr instructed me she routinely performs violent video games like Name of Obligation and the navy motion role-playing sport (RPG) The Division. “I’m not out right here attempting to homicide individuals,” she confused. However just like the Dad and mom Tv Council’s Winter, Cypheroftyr and most of the different individuals I spoke with agree that the gaming business must do much more to look at the at occasions surprising imagery it perpetuates.
A number of individuals I spoke with expressed frustration that the dialog about video video games’ position in mass shootings is obscuring one other, essential dialog available throughout the gaming neighborhood about violent video games.
Clark instructed me that the general public’s lack of nuance and an insistence on a binary studying of the difficulty is a part of the issue. “Most individuals are able to understanding that causes are advanced,” she stated, “that you would be able to’t simply level to 1 factor and say, ‘That is largely or totally in charge!’”
However she additionally cautioned that the gaming neighborhood’s reactionary defensiveness to this lack of nuance additionally prevents many online game followers from acknowledging that video games do play a task inside a violent tradition. “That complexity cuts each methods,” she instructed me. “Despite the fact that it’s foolish to say that ‘video games trigger violence,’ it’s additionally simply as foolish to say that video games don’t have anything to do with a tradition that has a violence drawback.”
That tradition is endemic to the gaming business, added Justin Carter, a contract journalist whose work focuses on video video games and tradition.
“The business does have a fetishization of weapons and violence,” Carter stated. “You have a look at video games like Borderlands or Future and one of many promoting factors is what number of weapons there are.” The upcoming first-person shooter sport Borderlands 3, he identified, boasts “over a billion” completely different weapons from its 12 fictional weapons producers, all of which tout particular perks to get gamers to strive their weapons. These perks function advertising each inside and out of doors the sport; the sport’s writer, 2K Video games, invitations gamers to exult in violence utilizing language that speaks for itself:
Ship devastating crucial hits to enemies’ soft-and-sensitives, then joy-puke as your bullets ricochet in direction of different targets. …
Step 1: Hit your enemies with tracker tags. Step 2: Unleash a hail of Good Bullets that observe in direction of your targets. Step 3: Loot!
Deal assured elemental harm together with your finger glued to the set off …
“There are only a few [action/adventure] video games that offer you choices apart from murdering individuals,” Cypheroftyr stated. “Video games don’t do sufficient to indicate the opposite aspect of it. You shoot somebody, you die, they die, you reset, you reload, and nothing occurs.”
“I do know that if I shoot individuals in a sport it’s not actual,” she added. “99.9 % of individuals don’t have to be instructed that. I’m not enjoying out an influence fantasy or something, however I’ve develop into extra conscious of how most video games [that] use violence [do so] to unravel issues.”
An insistence from sport builders on blithely ignoring the potential political messages of their video games is one other frustration for her. “All these sport makers are like, there’s no politics within the sport. There’s no message. And I’m like … did you simply ship me by way of a conflict museum and also you’re telling me this?!”
The sport Cypheroftyr is referencing is The Division 2, which encompasses a part the place gamers can have interaction in enemy fight throughout a walkthrough of a Vietnam Battle memorial museum. Whereas she loves the sport, she instructed me the truth that gamers use weapons from the Vietnam Battle period whereas in a conflict museum belies sport builders’ frequent arguments that such video games are apolitical.
One other sport Cypheroftyr has discovered disturbing in its try and background politics with none actual self-reflection is the favored journey sport Detroit Develop into Human, which shows pacifist Martin Luther King Jr. quotes alongside gameplay that enables gamers to decide on excessive violence as an possibility. “You possibly can take a extra pacifistic strategy, however you could not get the ending you need,” she defined.
She famous, too, that the navy makes use of video video games for coaching as a part of what’s been dubbed the “military-entertainment advanced,” with ways involving shooter video games that some ex-soldiers have referred to as “extra like brainwashing than something.” The US Military started exploring digital coaching in 1999 and started creating its first ways sport a 12 months later. The consequence, Full Spectrum Command, was a military-only model of 2003’s Full Spectrum Warrior. Since then, the navy has used video video games to show troopers every thing from easy methods to cope with fight eventualities to easy methods to work together with Iraqi civilians.
The shut connection between video games and sanctioned real-world violence, i.e., conflict, is difficult to disclaim with any plausibility. “When somebody insists that these two elements of tradition have completely nothing to do with one another,” Clark stated, “it smacks of denial, and lots of sport builders are asking themselves, ‘Do I need to be a part of this panorama?’ even when they’ve zero perception that video video games are inflicting violence.”
For all of the gaming business’s faults in the case of frankly addressing gaming’s position in a violent tradition, nonetheless, many individuals are fast to level out that critiques of in-game violence also can come from the video video games themselves. In Batman: Arkham Asylum, for instance, researchers Christina Fawcett and Steven Kohm just lately discovered that the sport “instantly implicate[s] the participant in violence enacted upon the our bodies of criminals and sufferers alike.” Different video games shift the main focus away from the perpetrators to the victims — for instance, This Battle of Mine is a survival sport impressed by the Bosnian Battle that focuses not on troopers however on civilians coping with the prices of wartime violence.
However acknowledging that critiques of violent video games are coming from throughout the gaming neighborhood doesn’t play effectively as a part of the gun management debate. “It’s far too straightforward to scapegoat video video games as low-hanging fruit as an alternative of addressing the actual points,” Cypheroftyr stated, “like the benefit with which we are able to get weapons on this nation, and why we don’t do extra to punish the perpetrators [of gun violence].” She additionally cites the cultural tendency to excuse masculine aggression early on with a “b“boys might be boys” mentality — which may breed the form of entitlement that results in extra violence afterward.
All these components mix to make the dialog round violent video video games inherently political and half of a bigger ongoing debate that finally facilities on which media messages are the most accountable for fueling real-world violence.
Video games journalist Carter instructed me he feels the gaming neighborhood must, in essence, reject the entire debate totally as a result of at this level in its life cycle, it’s disingenuous.
“We’ve been by way of sufficient shootings that you recognize the playbook, and it’s annoying that players and folks within the business will take this as a place that wants defending,” he instructed me. “It’s not a dialog price having anymore solely on post-traumatic phrases.”
Discussions about online game violence have to be held primarily throughout the video games neighborhood, Carter stated, and held “with people who find themselves truly fascinated by determining an answer as an alternative of politicians seeking to move off the blame for his or her ineptitude and greed.”
However some players instructed me they don’t belief the gaming neighborhood to border the dialog with applicable nuance. All of them cited Gamergate’s violent male entitlement and the impact that its subsequent bleed into the bigger alt-right motion’s misogyny and white supremacy have had on mainstream tradition at massive.
“The framing of that rhetoric that started in Gamergate as a part of the ‘low’ tradition of area of interest web boards grew to become a part of the mainstream political discourse,” criminologist Phillips identified. “The expression of their misogyny and the notion of being pushed out of their white male-dominated area was a microcosm of what was to return. We’re speaking about 8chan now, however [the growth of the alt-right] was fueled by gaming tradition.” She factors to Gamergate for example of the sophisticated interaction between gaming tradition, on-line communities filled with poisonous, violent rhetoric, and the rise of on-line extremism that’s more and more transferring offline.
Gaming sociologist Cross agreed. “At this second, there may be pressing must shine a light-weight on online game tradition, the fan areas which have been infiltrated by white supremacists seeking to recruit that minority of players who rage in opposition to ‘political correctness,’” she instructed me.
“We deal with video video games as unreal, as unserious play, and that creates a shadow over gaming boards and fan communities that has allowed toxicity to take root. It’s additionally allowed neo-Nazis to function largely unseen. That is what wants to vary.”
The ensuing shadow over gaming has unfold far and extensive — and located violent echoes within the rhetoric of Trump himself. “Have a look at what the particular person within the very highest workplace of the US is cultivating,” Cypheroftyr stated. “Poisonous masculinity, this concept that males, particularly white males, have been fed that they’re dropping ‘their’ nation.”
“Whereas video video games don’t affect us in a monkey-see-monkey-do method, they do, like all media, form how we see the world,” Cross argues. “Republicans, in broaching that risk, open themselves as much as the critique that their chief, who makes frequent use of each outdated media and social media, may also be influential in a poisonous manner.”
And this, finally, could also be why the present debate round video video games and violence feels significantly intense: The extremes of poisonous gaming tradition are fueling the attitudes of poisonous alt-right tradition, which in flip fuels the rhetoric of President Trump and lots of different right-wing politicians — the identical rhetoric that many white supremacist mass shooters are utilizing to justify their atrocities.
So when Trump rails in opposition to violence in video video games, as he’s now finished a number of occasions, he’s protesting a fictionalized model of the real-life violence that his personal rhetoric appears to tacitly encourage. If we’re to simply accept the argument that media violence as represented by video games is able to bringing about real-world violence, then certainly no media affect is extra highly effective or filled with harmful potential than that wielded by the president of the USA.
In 2018, Vice’s gaming vertical Waypoint devoted per week to “weapons and video games”; in a transferring piece outlining the intent of the venture, editor Austin Walker noticed that not like real-world violence, “in big-budget motion video games, and particularly video games that give the participant weapons and plentiful ammunition, violence is affordable and endlessly repeatable.”
But now, barely a 12 months later, mass shootings and different incidents of real-world violence have additionally begun to look endlessly repeatable. Maybe that’s the reason, ultimately, the urgency of shifting our cultural focus from fixing violence in video games to fixing violence in the actual world appears like it’s lastly outstripping the incessant debate.
Will you assist Vox’s explanatory journalism?
Tens of millions flip to Vox to grasp what’s taking place within the information. Our mission has by no means been extra very important than it’s on this second: to empower by way of understanding. Monetary contributions from our readers are a crucial a part of supporting our resource-intensive work and assist us hold our journalism free for all. Please contemplate making a contribution to Vox at present.


Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button